this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
41 points (97.7% liked)

Privacy

10577 readers
450 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.today/post/52903710

Since Microsoft owns Github, Gitlab is Corp owned now since 2022, why are so many who preach privacy or using Linux, etc, still using a MS product?

Genuine questions. I'm assumming either familiarity & simplicity with GH or difficulty migrating elsewhere?

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because there hasn’t been enough discomfort to disrupt established workflows yet.

I remember when Sourceforge hit that tipping point. Microsoft and Gitlab likely do too.

[–] M33@piefed.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That ⬆️

And the fact all alternatives must have federated signon and repos. Otherwise it’s just annoyance and fragmentation where GitHub provides a smooth, unified experience.

[–] 5ymm3trY@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I am not really the target of your question, because I am not a developer of something in particular. I mainly use git to backup and track my Linux and Docker config. There are a few unfinished side-projects as well, but nothing really interesting. I personally chose Gitlab over Codeberg mainly because of the ability to create private repos. The repos don't contain any private info but I don't saw any real benefit for the general public either. However, this decision was a couple of years ago.

As of late, I want to use git also for other stuff that potentially contains data I am not willing to share. Therefore I want to setup my personal Forgejo instance. I like the idea of Codeberg. My goal is to host everything I really want to keep private on my personal instance and move everything else to Codeberg.

[–] voxel@feddit.uk 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)
  1. Codeberg allows you to make private repos.
  2. They don't like being used as external storage, as this is not what they're providing this service for to the community. I think the same applies to GitHub and Gitlab,, that using them as a external storage is not very ethical and may violate the ToS.
  3. A personal Forgejo instance for such purposes would be a good idea.
[–] 5ymm3trY@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 months ago

You are right that Codeberg allows private repos. As I said, this was a couple of years ago. Not sure if it was different back then. I just remember Gitlab being less restrictive about their private repo policy and since I wasn't really sure about my requirements I chose Gitlab over Codeberg. Yes, their whole mission is to support FOSS and private repos contradict that and just creates a burden for hosting on their side, so it is totally understandable.

[–] unitedwithme@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago

I just setup Forgejo on Yunohost myself. I'm very green to all this git stuff though.

[–] uenticx@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

We've been happy with gitea, argocd and openproject. After 8 years in a vendor locked EKS situation from all angles, I would never go back.