this post was submitted on 08 May 2026
423 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

84820 readers
3187 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 108 points 1 week ago (2 children)

precisely why I won't talk to someone wearing a camera, or pointing a camera at me.. I'll stand there in silence the entire time, or just walk away.

put the camera down, talk or buh bye..

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“But I want to document what you say!”

🤐🖕

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Only time it's acceptable is in front of a cop since they can't be trusted to operate the cameras they should be wearing themselves

[–] pilferjinx@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago

Any public servants, really. Private citizens in public should have a bit of protection from potential harassment.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

The point is that she didn't even know she was being recorded. That's why this story is all about the smart glasses being used to covertly record people.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I got a tour of a military base with a guy who was wearing smart glasses and I couldn't fucking believe that someone didn't grab them off his face and break them in half. I was being VERY careful to ask if I was permitted to take pictures in some places (in at least one of which where the answer was No), and this dude was cruising around like Boris Badunov trying to gather secrets.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Might be a good time to tell someone.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I DID tell the guide what he was wearing because I didn't want us to end up in a military detention cell but the guide was like "Eh, it's fine," so I guess it was, but boy it didn't feel like it should have been!

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 week ago

it was fine because guide probably didnt understand the concept of glasses being able to record stuff, otherwise it would have been fine for you to take pictures too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maestro@fedia.io 15 points 1 week ago (85 children)

If I ever see someone wearing smart glasses near me I will slap them off their face.

[–] littleomid@feddit.org 60 points 1 week ago

No you won’t.

load more comments (83 replies)
[–] neineon77@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 week ago (5 children)

another reason to continue masking in public tbh

probably going to start purposefully looking away from people if they try to talk to me with those on and if they push it I'll ask them to take them off and if they refuse to disengage completely

I know none of this is foolproof but it at least is social pressure and signalling to anyone around that I'm trying to avoid them if it escalates

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Need some of those things movie stars use against the paparazzi.

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] toynbee@piefed.social 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

I suspect they meant the patterned clothing that confuses cameras.

I am against constant surveillance and these are huge privacy violations, especially because it seems very unlikely they're storing the media exclusively locally. Also, the fact that they can be more discreet than many other options for recording is concerning.

The first two ads I ever saw for these were of a guy using them to quietly cheat at, IIRC, a board game; and of someone having a conversation, only to realize the other party was recording it. They looked like legit ads, but I'm not sure how anyone could think that was positive press.

All that said, the number of people advocating violence in response is alarming. Depending on the environment, I feel the appropriate response is to ask the wearer to remove them and then, if they refuse, remove either yourself or them from the situation. Obviously no one solution fits all situations and there may be situations where violence is warranted, but it is surprising to me that it seems to be the default.

edit: Recently started using a new keyboard on my phone, had to correct a word it chose for me. The meaning I was trying to convey was not altered.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So WW2 dazzle camouflage? As a bonus, you are also protected from packs of roving U-boats!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)

Literally black mirror

[–] MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

BBC News - Woman covertly filmed for 'humiliating' social media content - BBC News https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/videos/cdxpqg22q34o

Video version of the original story. He comes across as a creep.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is not about smart glasses.

holding a glass slab in front of someone’s face is a lot more likely to be clocked.

So pervert blackmailers switch to button cameras. They are cheaper and even less obvious than thick black ray bans.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

So pervert blackmailers switch to button cameras. T

It is entirely about smart glasses. button cameras have been around for AGES. But they have shit lenses and crap sensors; these fucking chodes want to up the production value on the nonconsensual porn they already shoot with their phones - on the stairs up skirts, down the blouses of women, etc.,

they want a head cam with better resolution and head tracking.

keep advocating for the perverts

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›