pretty much every 'blue' or 'potentially-blue' state has been dragged to court because they didn't 'comply' with the unconstitutional (because states run elections, not the feds) data grab
this post was submitted on 05 May 2026
55 points (96.6% liked)
Politics
1286 readers
171 users here now
For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.
Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable
Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.
Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.
The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up
Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)
Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term
Media owners, CEOs and/or board members
Monitor every stock trade Congress and the White House makes
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I didn't read the article, but there is of course almost a 1:1 correlation between states that voted for Biden in the 2020 election and states that have been sued for not providing voter information. All the while there are several states that voted for trump in the same election, have not provided any voter information, and have also not been sued. Makes it very obvious what they're up to.
States that hate freedom and privacy. They love to be told what to do so they can turn around and do the same to others. These are dangerous people.
Oklahoma provider information it was public info, but did tell them how obtain the info they were looking for.
Social Security numbers aren't public info.
This should've been the default response for every state really - just some generic boilerplate description of where they can find the publicly available voter information. That way you're not inviting conflict by outright refusing, but you're also not helping them at all, and telling them they can do their own work or go fuck themselves.
A LMGTFY