this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
31 points (87.8% liked)

Technology

42578 readers
1 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Cross posted from https://lemmy.ml/post/46710548

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ace_garp@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Title:

LinkedIn spyware is proven to be insane.

But totally expected.

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago

Not gonna lie, I'm not even gonna read the article. LinkedIn is FUCKED. LinkedIn I think is what the hunting ground of true psychopaths looks like. Nothing is sacred enough there not to be offered as sacrafise on the altar of capital.

Perform for us the rituals. Humiliate yourself sufficiently and we will let you humiliate more of your own. Climb the ladder.

[–] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Omfg can we go a few weeks without a big leak pls?

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

lol no. It’s just going to get worse. Companies gobble up s as much info s as they can, it’s profitable, protecting it, less so. Not to mention ai, both from the standpoint of people creating systems they don’t understand, and from the other side where hacking with ai assistance is easier.

We need to change the systems and structure of the world to make any meaningful progress

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

protecting it is not "profitable" because they get no real consequences for these breaches.

[–] mynameisbob@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

They create the problem to solve the problem

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

That's all this comes down too. The data has value to them and their shareholders. Paying money to secure it is a cost that they want to minimize

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

LinkedIn is basically a public resume. Using it for anything more demonstrates that you do not have a basic grasp of privacy or security. As such, there shouldn't be anything up there which is all that bad to have leaked. Sure, if the password database gets dumped, rotate your LinkedIn password (it should already be unique, so no worries about it being reused elsewhere). And having an email address get added to every spam list everywhere kinda sucks. But, what else is the attacker going to get, my name and work history, which are already public on the site?

I mean, yes LinkedIn should be raked over the coals for shit security practices. And we really need something like the GDPR here in the US to actually do that. But, I'm also not going to get terribly worked up about my public CV being leaked. The leak is kinda redundant.

[–] magnue@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ok so there's no data leak. It's just repackaged old news.

[–] mynameisbob@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

really what ain't old news... there ain't nothing new under the sun