Phew.. I thought valve is quitting
this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2026
11 points (70.4% liked)
Europe
11065 readers
960 users here now
News and information from Europe πͺπΊ
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons), archive:is,ph,today (their JS DDoS websites)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah, most of us use wind and solar now.
More seriously though, if this keeps going when are we likely to see any real impact for the average person and in what form? So far I haven't really noticed anything different.
https://flex-power.energy/energyblog/the-great-decoupling/
Energy prices are decoupling from fossil fuel volatility. Just one of the reasons the fossil fuel lobby is dumping massive amounts of money into anti-renewable desinformation and lobbying (read: corruption) so politicians promote idiotic schemes to cap fuel prices instead.
Actually doing not much at all and just keeping the momentum of an ongoing energy transition going would be a perfectly reasonable plan. Instead a lot of countries are doing the opposite: sabotaging progress while inventing rediculous measures to allegedly relieve people of pressure from increased energy prices that are nothing but another round of gifts for the fossil-fuel loving energy companies those politicians actually work for.
I was gonna make a pun about Steam, the game store, but yours is better. My hat's off to you for a great response.
There are few big differences that account for the difference in effect and response so far.
The Russian invasion of Ukraine began in February 2022, the tail end of winter, and had an immediate impact on gas supplies due to sanctions. Europe, particularly Eastern Europe and Germany, was particularly dependent on Russian gas for heating. There was an immediate potential issue if we'd had a cold snap as well as an inevitability of limited gas supplies to rebuild the reserves over the summer into the next winter.
The Iran conflict started at the end of March 2026, the beginning of spring, and has impacted on oil supplies. But Europe does not get oil from the middle east via the Strait of Hormuz; instead those supplies go east to India, China and Japan for example.
At present there is not a physical shortage in Europe; supplies have already been secured and paid for before the conflict. That will change as the crisis goes on. Oil prices are at persistent high, and also there is going to be increased competition for the 80% of energy supplies not blockaded. That will impact Europe as much as the rest of the world. It is unlikely oil will run out completely, but certain users will be priced out of the market as oil contracts are renewed and prices feed through to end users. It's likely some businesses across many countries that are not economical when oil is above $100 a barrel will suffer or even close, and fuel prices will dissuade people form using their cars and flying. So there will be shortages more in the sense of affordability which will cause inflation and probably a recession.
There isn't much point in Europe doing much to try to intervene right now. The shortages are currently focused in countries with current contracts for oil that should have come via the strait. That will change, but until it does it is unpredictable exactly how it will impact Europe. Add to that the perhaps foolish hope (and gamble by markets) that this will be temporary and that explains why there is a reluctance to act.
I'm amazed that anyone believes a word Trump says on this. We have a stalemate in the middle east at present, and its unlikely either side will back down in the next few weeks. The general feeling seems to be that the US has lost this war, and is more likely to back down first as it cannot reopen the strait be force. Iran is certainly suffering economically from the US blockade, but no where near as badly as the US and global economy will suffer if this continues.
I find the article too short, dropping detail before explaining the bigger picture. The headline seems to want to evoke some sort of strong sentiment, but the article itself is running out of steam.
But the biggest reason for Europeβs lacklustre response to the looming economic crisis caused by the latest Middle East war is that the bloc has no gas left in the tank β literally, because gas storage is at a nine-year low.
- nb, "looming". Not saying they're wrong but this is a weasel word
- same with "lacklustre" - this is also not sufficiently explained by the preceding points of the article
- "low" does not equal "no" - another wrong use of "literally"
1/5 stars
Blowing so much money on fossil fuel subsidies left the EU vulnerable to an oil crisis, greatly limit the budget available to invest in renewables or to react to such crisis.