this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
111 points (100.0% liked)

Climate

8707 readers
315 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Capitalism is a religion composed of beliefs not a rational system of selfish tendencies.

How else does this make sense?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Shareholders own other things to, and care about stuff like a planet for their grandkids to live on, not just the next quarterly profit.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 month ago

How selfish of them to put their own interests above the interests of profit for the entire corporation!

[–] iThinkDifferentThanU@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lmao share whatever ya smokin

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 month ago

The management doesn't care. But people do, when you take away the indirection of control through mutual funds and such.

[–] ExFed@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

It's right there in the article.

The resolution called on BP to explain how its pursuit of rising oil and gas production aligned with a world shifting away from fossil fuels.

“The question is simple: how does BP plan to create value for shareholders as oil and gas demand declines?” said Mark van Baal, the founder of Follow This. “BP would rather antagonise its shareholders than answer it.”

That seems perfectly rational to me.