this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
23 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

54082 readers
423 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If I ever have enough money, I’m thinking of setting up my own small server and migrating Lemmy to I2P. A Lemmy instance with the same features, but running on a completely free and anonymous network. Everything will be allowed except for moderation regarding serious topics and spam. It’s a nice thought, even just imagining it.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

Hard to pierce pseudonymity doesn't interest me that much, because it's bad enough having all your posts connected together.

I want something like 4chan (but heavily moderated), where all posts are just marked "Anonymous" and if you make 3 different comments, it's not publicly shown that they came from the same person. It's ok to retain the info privately for a short period, for moderation purposes. It could be ok to assign a persistent pseudonym for each thread, so if you comment 3 times in the same thread, those comments are connected to each other, but not to other comments in other threads.

This is a good article about the attractions of completely anonymous posting, though it's from the pre-supertoxic internet era: https://wakaba.c3.cx/shii/shiichan

[–] linuxguy@piefed.ca 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How would it federate? Both in and out.

[–] Eric@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

My guess would be a clearnet 'bridge' lemmy for federation purposes.

[–] Bazell@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So, will it be a separate social network or a part of the Fediverse that will be able to communicate with the others?

[–] ptt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

Outproxy (I2P β†’ Clearnet)

and

Inproxy (Clearnet β†’ I2P)

This can be done via these methods. Alternatively, a dual-stack instance might be a much more practical approach.

An instance operates both on the clearnet (lemmy.example.org) and on I2P (as an .i2p eepsite). This instance acts as a bridge: lemmy.i2p ←→ bridge instance ←→ clearnet fediverse Federation is established indirectly through this bridge.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

I don't see how it could federate unless the other lemmy instances are on I2P also. This seems more like an isolated/standalone idea for an instance

[–] monovergent@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would be too lazy to, unless I eventually encounter my 'gateway drug' to i2p.

[–] Eric@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My main concern would be usability. i2p usually has lag in the hundreds of milliseconds, which would make something full-featured like lemmy kind of a pain I think. I'd imagine it would be so slow

[–] ptt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm sure that won't happen.

[–] Eric@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How can you be so sure? There is a reddit clone on i2p already and it's very slow

[–] ptt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

Users will, of course, have to accept that I2P is slow. Still, by using i2pd, optimizing the number of tunnels, and opting for a minimalist web interface, I can create a Lemmy instance that’s quite useful for the I2P community. I’ll make sure it’s a PWA. I can implement aggressive caching.

[–] AstroLightz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Probably not. I2P is a pain to set up, for little benefit other than a decentralized network. The latency is not worth it currently.

When it becomes click and install, and the latency is improved, then maybe.

My concern would be federation. I don't think the fediverse is set up so you can run the same service on the clearnet and dark net.

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Everything will be allowed except for moderation regarding serious topics and spam.

So you're making a Nazi bar

Yeah it would have to have some serious moderation to prevent it from turning that way

[–] ptt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

By adding rules like β€œOnly the X community can share posts from I2P to the Clearnet,” I can be sure I’m not disturbing the rest of the Fediverse community.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are people actually using I2P?