this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
11 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse vs Disinformation

2226 readers
39 users here now

Pointing out, debunking, and spreading awareness about state- and company-sponsored astroturfing on Lemmy and elsewhere. This includes social media manipulation, propaganda, and disinformation campaigns, among others.

Propaganda and disinformation are a big problem on the internet, and the Fediverse is no exception.

What's the difference between misinformation and disinformation? The inadvertent spread of false information is misinformation. Disinformation is the intentional spread of falsehoods.

By equipping yourself with knowledge of current disinformation campaigns by state actors, corporations and their cheerleaders, you will be better able to identify, report and (hopefully) remove content matching known disinformation campaigns.


Community rules

Same as instance rules, plus:

  1. No disinformation
  2. Posts must be relevant to the topic of astroturfing, propaganda and/or disinformation

Related websites


Matrix chat links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Times editorial, surveying this reality, informs its readers that the regime deserves no sympathy. Had Iran launched a comparable preemptive strike on Washington—killing the president, his officials and family members during active negotiations, while simultaneously killing over 100 American children—the Times and the entire political establishment would have responded with a fury that would have made the reaction to September 11 appear measured. The demand for accountability would have admitted no qualification.

The Iranian dead receive none of this. The children among them are unacknowledged. The widows of assassinated officials generate no moral consideration. The “no sympathy” formulation erases them from the moral universe within which the editorial’s readers are invited to evaluate the war—a universe in which Iranian lives constitute a categorically different order of existence from American lives, one that imposes no obligations of acknowledgment or accountability on those who have taken them. This is not incidental to the editorial’s politics. It is their moral foundation, designed to ensure that Phase Two can be organized and prosecuted with the same indifference to Iranian human life that characterized Phase One.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Writers for 'the new york times' deserve no sympathy.

[–] Sepia@mander.xyz 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The wsws is a strong source of misinformation and disinformation itself. It conveys the Chinese Communist Party's propaganda and support the war mongering around Taiwan. I don't support the US and Israel, but this 'comment' is outright gibberish. This website is full of fake news.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

this ‘comment’ is outright gibberish.

What don't you understand?

edit: Holy post history.