this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
51 points (85.9% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

2160 readers
41 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether it be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users, as it handwaves their extremism.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post, rather than engaging in arguments that lack mutual agreement.

Brigading/Trolling — If you're here because this community was linked in another thread, please refrain from maliciously voting, commenting, or manipulating the post in any way. This includes alt accounts. All votes are public, and if you are found to be brigading, you will be banned. Good-faith and honest communication is an exception.

Tankies can explain their views, but may be criticised or challenged for them. Any minor infraction of the rules may result in a warning and possibly a temporary ban.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically last only 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction doubles the duration. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There are some voices of reason in the thread saying that NASA money is a drop in the bucket compared to war spending, but there's a whole lot of support for space exploration by China (and Russia), because of course it's only bad when "USian"

https://hexbear.net/post/8170388

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 week ago

It's not JUST that it's a drop in the bucket compared to the rest of the budget, but it is a huge boon in science for the world.

Almost everything NASA produces is public domain. Even from a capitalist perspective, we get more out of NASA than we put in. Heck, even if you feel like it's just a jobs program, it's a jobs program for highly trained people.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I caught up with the launch stream over the weekend, and was quite excited until they went into full USA nationalistic propaganda mode and mentioned how the US become the best democracy on earth and freedom blah blah blah. Completetly ruined it.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

until they

Yeah I get why that sucks. I didn't see it but I'm assuming "they" was a bunch of govt suits instead of NASA scientists?

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean, it's an official govt stream for an official govt project. I'd be surprised if they didn't do that

Sad part is it was probably similar to what was said during Apollo but the national context changed quite a bit since then

Ok, but Whitey on the Moon is actually fire.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 10 points 1 week ago

I mean, when you consider the two programs on a purely technical level, that post seems like an accurate description to me. Artemis is a huge mess and has been from the start, the Chinese program has taken a much better approach.

Part of that is likely just perception because China doesn't reveal much about their plans before the fact, so we don't get to see as much of where they change their minds along the way or the political wrangling that gets them there. But the end results are different enough that I think a case can be made that China's still approaching this better even allowing for the hidden stuff.

[–] lefaucet@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 week ago

Nasa has created massive economic benefits for the economy and technological innovations that have improved quality of life in a very real way.

Gil Scott Heron had a very valid point that we need to focus on our sister Nell, but Whitey on the Moon is a net benefit to sister Nell and not the reason we ain't taking care of her.

In 2025 Nasa got $24 billion ICE got $80 billion Military got $919 billion

I got a guess as to which one is most likely to shoot your sister Nell. Lets take money from that one

...Also When Whitey on the Moon was written, NASA got like 4% of the US budget. NASA now gets 0.35%

[–] timestatic@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago

The rocket uses pretty outdated tech thats true. I wish they invested more money into developing a reusable rocket like SpaceX once instead of like building throw away boosters. But the crew module was actually tested and they had multiple plans for reentry in case their sensors were of.

[–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 0 points 1 week ago

"Global south"

Been a while since I heard that. Seemed like that agenda had been put in the fridge. Did anyone get peckish?