this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
285 points (97.3% liked)

Linux

66993 readers
314 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not strictly Linux..

But after reading about SystemD I realised that TempleOS would fall under the laws but there's no way in hell that's getting updated. There's gotta be some amazing way to troll the lawmakers with this.

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 81 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, and I'd say it's a bit questionable whether California even has jurisdiction over revelations from God himself.

Also, I don't think it does networking and app stores 😄

[–] lime@feddit.nu 50 points 5 months ago

there is a networking module in the Shrine fork. i think its internal name is "heretic" as it is against god's will.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 65 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's a bit hard for him to comply. Why, you ask? Well, for starter, he's dead.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 months ago

The glowies got to him!

[–] HuntressHimbo@lemmy.zip 57 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

"You wouldn't ask to put age verification on a Bible would you mister representative?"

[–] msage@programming.dev 27 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If those people actually read the bible, they would never let a child near it.

[–] cravl@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If they actually read the Bible, they would never ~~let a child near it~~ go near a child.

ftfy

[–] msage@programming.dev 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I don't think the bible cures pedophilia.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Depends on the velocity of the bible.

[–] msage@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago

Now I'm imagining 9mm bibles flying... thank you for that image.

[–] cravl@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 months ago

Well of course it doesn't, God does.

[–] Labfox@lemmy.labfox.fr 36 points 5 months ago (5 children)

SystemD is only adding the possibility to store an age for the user, and the PR is being debated still

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 22 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Why would a glorified scheduling service need to store my birthday? Or age. Am I soon supposed to show/store my ID to all services running on my computer?

[–] Mordikan@kbin.earth 8 points 4 months ago

An equally valid question is why does a glorified scheduling service want to act as my UEFI boot manager?

[–] Labfox@lemmy.labfox.fr 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The systemd service in question is probably already managing your accounts (if you've got systemd, that is)

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It may be so, but it doesn't know my birthday nor my ID 🤷

[–] Labfox@lemmy.labfox.fr 1 points 4 months ago

And it won't unless something else tells it

[–] msage@programming.dev 15 points 4 months ago

Trojan horse, so to speak.

Preemtive capitulation is a loss for everyone but the fascists.

[–] Mordikan@kbin.earth 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think the point people are making here is why does systemd need to store an age for the user.

[–] Labfox@lemmy.labfox.fr 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It can already store location data and other random metadata

[–] Mordikan@kbin.earth 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Define "location data".

Systemd stores location data for unit files, it does not store geo lookup data. Again, why does systemd need to store user age?

[–] Labfox@lemmy.labfox.fr 2 points 4 months ago

It can store your location data (i.e City/Address), because this service is specifically a user database. The systemd init isn't storing your age anytime son.

[–] org@lemmy.org 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Good way to lose your market share overnight

[–] Cysioland@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Ah yes, systemd is gonna lose so many sales over this, they're gonna have to lower their monthly subscription price from $0.00 to a measly $0.00

[–] org@lemmy.org 1 points 4 months ago
[–] Bilbo@hobbit.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There are a lot of Linux distros. Capitulation to age verification is a good way to know that a distro is compromised generally. Now I need to figure out how not to use systemd.

[–] Liketearsinrain@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

If you have some Linux experience, you could try something like void linux , alpine or gentoo. Sadly, systemd is entrenched so deeply on most distros that removing it would be painful.

There is also devuan (debian without systemd) but I can't recommend it.

[–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago

If I ever find systemd-ageverificationd on my computer I'm nuking it

[–] moody@lemmings.world 30 points 5 months ago (1 children)

TempleOS would fall under the laws

So would DOS and Windows 95, but those haven't had any updates in a couple years. Surely they'll be updated to comply.

[–] MissingGhost@lemmy.ml 18 points 5 months ago

FreeDOS' latest version is from 2025. Guess they would be required to comply. They don't even have user accounts...

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 26 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I'm getting to old for this age verification bullshit.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 11 points 5 months ago

Those getting too old for this are the ones who are 14

[–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 months ago

Let me guess, you're 2147483647

[–] sakuraba@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 months ago

there is no way on hell, but there may be a way in heaven

[–] Qey@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 months ago

Oh crap, why didn't you tell me this earlier?

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 5 points 4 months ago

I'm still super impressed by homie doing this all on his own. Rest in power homie, wish you sought out professional help.

[–] jokeyrhyme@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

this new anti-systemd sentiment reminds me of anti-TPM and anti-SecureBoot sentiment

having TPMs and SecureBoot on Linux machines has only ever empowered device owners to ensure that the software on their devices has not been tampered with

there's never been a case where these technologies were used against Linux device owners

likewise, I predict that Linux device owners may find the age field useful for certain opt-in parental controls, but we'll otherwise look back on this and shrug at the extreme paranoia