this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
-1 points (33.3% liked)

Europe

11242 readers
347 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

...

The Iranian regime executes women and homosexuals, finances global terrorism, and has breached its obligations under nuclear non-proliferation agreements.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has issued two resolutions condemning Iran, stating that cooperation from the Iranian regime is non-existent and that it is impossible to verify that the nuclear programme has exclusively peaceful purposes.

...

The Iranian regime has been, for decades, the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism through the Revolutionary Guard (IRGC) and its Quds Force.

Terrorist actions promoted by the Iranian regime in recent years extend from Argentina to Bahrain, Lebanon, the United Arab Emirates, and Syria.

...

In recent weeks, the regime's campaign of repression has caused, according to independent medical organisations, the deaths of more than 32,000 Iranians, in addition to the detention, torture, and execution of dissidents and their families, the blocking of the internet, and the suppression of any independent information.

...

Part of the left selectively appeals to "international law" and the UN Charter, using them as a moral alibi to avoid assuming the political cost of confronting regimes like Iran's.

That reading systematically ignores the regime's own prior actions, from financing terrorist groups to direct attacks with drones and missiles.

Have they not noticed how they only remember international law and human rights when doing so allows totalitarian dictatorships to remain in power?

Sánchez states, in a paternalistic tone, that "one can be against an odious regime like Iran's and against an unjustified attack," but his actions show otherwise.

...

Between 2018 and 2024, the government authorised millions in exports to Iran of "dual-use" material (civilian and military), according to official trade data.

...

Presenting the Islamic Republic as a passive actor that "has not attacked anyone" is an insult to intelligence

...

[Spain's PM Pedro] Sánchez's position consists of always being very tough on democracies and Western partners and very soft on terrorist dictatorships.

He only remembers international law and human rights when doing so allows him to perpetuate and whitewash dictatorships.

Sánchez has received congratulations from Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, the Iranian regime, the Cuban dictatorship, the Chavista regime, and all the world's communist leaders. He has become the favourite leader of terrorists and totalitarians.

The position of the Spanish Government is neither neutral nor pacifist; it is a mixture of selective legalism and ideological calculation that leaves us worse positioned before our partners, weakens our security, and puts investment and economic growth at risk.

When an administration that has authorised sales of sensitive material to Iran claims a monopoly on "international law" to wash its hands of the response to that same regime, it is not on the right side of history but on the cowardly side of political marketing at the expense of national interest.

...

Archive

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stepan@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 months ago

Saying no to war is a luxury when you are protected by NATO, the United States, and Israel, and your neighbours are countries like France or Portugal

United states, member of NATO, launches illegal war. NATO is a defense alliance. If being protected by NATO means obligation to support wars started by it's members, then it's not a defense alliance but a global terror organization.

And we are not protected by Israel. That's hilarious. Israel exists only because of European and US aid and their will to ignore and even help with their wars and a genocide.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago

That's a lot of text to somehow construct an equivalent of "they broke the law, so I can also break any law" as morally right.

[–] Kennystillalive@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Terms like Terms like "odious regime," "terrorist dictatorships," "whitewash," and "insult to intelligence" used in this article, just show there is a clear agenda by the writter of the article and that the article is not meant to be an analysis but a hit piece on Spain / Sanches

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Emopunker@feddit.org 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you are going to leave this up, then I will just hit the checkmark on the report someone in this comments section made.

Still post is pretty borderline. Like if we delete obvious pro-China or pro-Russia propaganda, I believe pro-Trumpist USA propaganda should be treated the same way. But since it is your comm, it's your call.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net -1 points 2 months ago

The article is shit, but I kinda agree that the Spanish government is hypocritical in this situation, but mostly for other reasons than the article states.

Anyways, this post gathered some reasonable discussion about the topic and I don't think people will get the wrong impression that this article is something we endorse here.

[–] tardigrade@scribe.disroot.org -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sanchez is (rightfully) criticizing the US war on Iran citing human rights and the rule of law here while he has apparently no problem to actively seek cooperation with dictatorships, which often even undermines European security. For example, he has no problem cooperating with China in complete disregard of Beijing's decades long rights violations and crimes against humanity. It's deeply hypocritical.

[–] Kennystillalive@feddit.org 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You know, who also does lots crimes against humanity? The US. They are really good at it. Doesn't matter who is at power Democrat or Republican. & you know what is really hypocritical? Saying China is bad while supporting the US.

Newsflash to you: on the neo imperialistic stage there is no good or evil. It's just evil vs evil. Condeming when one side that crosses the line by being super evil is actually not something to critize.

Also if you want to talk about Europes interest, you should also start talking how this war just fucks Europe over. In more than just one way. It starts with the imediate ones: Oil and gas prices, the inflagion caused by it and goes over to the floods of refugees that will follow.

Let me ask you one question: why support this war? It's clear there won't be regime change and that it won't be over fast. It was clear from the begining and is now even clearer. You who supports the US's actions tell me why this war?

And don't try to argue with yeah, "but the Iranian goverment evil. They did over 30k people dirty". Today Unicef published a paper explaining that since the war startet over 700k lebanese people had to leave their homes due to the attacks by Israel and the US, 200k of which were children. Do you see what this "peace" looks like? Explain these 200k kids, why tomorrow they can't go to play with their friends. Can you do that?

[–] tardigrade@scribe.disroot.org -1 points 2 months ago

Whataboutism? The US, Russia, North Korea, and many others are also committing terrible crimes.

But all this doesn't heal Sanchez's double standards regarding Iran while at the same time cooperating with dictatorships like China. This is about Spain and his PM.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nothing is hypocritical; a warmongering fascist nation declaring war against another country, that is the problem.

Spain takes an ethical stance in that regard.

[–] tardigrade@scribe.disroot.org -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It is deeply hypocritical. You can't collaborate with Iran, China, and other dictatorships and then speak of human rights. Sanchez seeks to distract from his own troubles - a series of corruption scandals, the recent train crashes, his Socialist party's lost regional elections of late.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

You haven't replied to whether it is hypocritical to oppose a fascist warmongerer invade a country.

Edit: I looked into OP's user history, and it's giving me astroturfing vibes. Blocked them.

[–] tardigrade@scribe.disroot.org -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Then read my comment again. It is hypocritical to oppose one human rights violation like the war in Iran, but then collaborate with a dictatorship like China that is committing crimes against humanity on a large scale.

[–] teddyt@feddit.org 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So you would prefer Spain to not oppose a human right violation, like bombing a girls school in a foreign country.

[–] tardigrade@scribe.disroot.org -1 points 2 months ago

You don't refer to my comment.

It is hypocritical to oppose one human rights violation like the war in Iran, but then collaborate with a dictatorship like China that is committing crimes against humanity on a large scale.