Privacy

48259 readers

1060 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

Google pulls the plug on uBlock Origin, leaving over 30 million Chrome users susceptible to intrusive ads (www.windowscentral.com)

submitted 2 years ago by Alsephina@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Google's campaign against ad blockers across its services just got more aggressive. According to a report by PC World, the company has made some alterations to its extension support on Google Chrome.

Google Chrome recently changed its extension support from the Manifest V2 framework to the new Manifest V3 framework. The browser policy changes will impact one of the most popular adblockers (arguably), uBlock Origin.

The transition to the Manifest V3 framework means extensions like uBlock Origin can't use remotely hosted code. According to Google, it "presents security risks by allowing unreviewed code to be executed in extensions." The new policy changes will only allow an extension to execute JavaScript as part of its package.

Over 30 million Google Chrome users use uBlock Origin, but the tool will be automatically disabled soon via an update. Google will let users enable the feature via the settings for a limited period before it's completely scrapped. From this point, users will be forced to switch to another browser or choose another ad blocker.

Archive link

all 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In their eyes they just made 30 million more customers.

Fucking parasites.

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They made Firefox a good number of new customers.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I‘m really anxious for firefox as google is the main financier afaik.

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It is a worry. I think we might end up needing to pay for Firefox ourselves.

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I will happily donate.
If, of course, money won't go to the CEO.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A CEO is a needed possition, I know in the past the Brendan Eich was controversial in his political views, but Laura Chambers seems ok so far

[–] BRINGit34@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A CEO is a needed possition

Ha! Good one...

oh wait. You're serious...

How is a ceo needed? They do no work. Their entire job is to rake in cash from workers.

All a ceo needs is a guillotine.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Right.

And a football team doesn't need a quarterback.

🤦🏼‍♂️

Yes, many of them are assholes, doesn't change the need for the leadership.