this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2025
37 points (100.0% liked)

news

990 readers
715 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Review not required.

Release the files.

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

The law does require them to review each file before release, and redact identifying information about any of the victims (and only the victims)

It also specifies that reputational damage is not a valid reason for redacting information

Somehow I suspect the Trump admin is using a very broad definition of "victim" though

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What part of "total release no later than end of day 19th December 2025" didn't they get? They don't get to spend time cherry picking what they want to release.

[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

No one can or will enforce it so they have the time in the world

[–] Colonel_Panic@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

That's a lot of documents to black out Trump's name from. They better get moving if they don't want to break yet another law by missing the court ordered deadline that was 5 days ago.