I must be thinking of the wrong Wireshark because the one I know of is a packet capture program not a VPN client/server.
Selfhosted
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil.
-
No spam.
-
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
-
Submission headline should match the article title.
-
No trolling.
-
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.
-
AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
Maybe Wireguard?
Yep. Edited. Definitely autocorrect's fault, not my morning brain fog.
No, actually you're right. I meant wire guard.
All good mate.
You are asking the WG server to listen to incoming requests from outside your lan subnet, so it is ignoring VPN requests from that subnet.
There are two solutions to this:
- Add routing to your wireguard server instance to allow the VPN intermediary subnet to accept connections from your lan subnet or
- Allow your wireguard client to split-tunnel, so it can reach subnets that aren't reachable outside your WG tunnel.
Thank you, this is really helpful, a good place to start.