this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2025
11 points (70.4% liked)

Technology

42523 readers
19 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Pumped water storage is kinda a gravity battery, and it's currently the largest stored energy source for most countries.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, they mention it in the vid. It's the exact same principle, but this way you can do it anywhere without needing a large body of water near by.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago

Watched the vido now. Seems these gravity battery facilities might not be as efficient (80% to pumped hydro's 90%), but you can construct them anywhere, and don't need a mountainous land area nearby. Nice.

[–] ki9@lemmy.gf4.pw 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I thought about building a gravity battery in my yard.

The math is E = mgh. Not complicated. I think the conclusion was that to charge my cell phone from zero to 100% I would have to lower 1, 000 pounds from a height of 100 feet. Had to make some assumptions about my phone battery capacity... But still... Wildly inefficient.

That was before losses and this video says the building is 80% efficiency.

So whenever I see one of these grav batts actually being built, I wonder if they checked? I mean, it has some capacity but will it ever be worth the construction costs?

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 months ago

These things only make sense at very large scale. China has already built some and they've approved more projects going forward. https://www.enlit.world/library/china-connects-gravity-storage-and-launches-three-new-projects

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Interesting, but I'm curious about how it comlaresbto other technologies in cost, maintenance, and efficiency. There are molten salt batteries being tested as well as hydrogen fuel cells, even heated concrete and flywheels.

These seem simple but that can hide complex problems.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 months ago

The approach China is taking is to invest in all kinds of different approaches, and then see what works. I imagine the answer is going to be that different types of energy storage will work best in different situations. Something like gravity storage might be useful for balancing short term fluctuations in the grid, it can be built anywhere, and it's very safe.

[–] Catalyst_A@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

I fixed your link for you. It now redirects to an invidious back end instead of YouTube. https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/watch?v=mxKsK8lPpv8