this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2026
400 points (98.8% liked)

Selfhosted

63596 readers
795 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

RyanL Bitwarden Employee

Hello everyone!

Starting in the next release, the Bitwarden apps published to the various stores will be the commercially licensed builds. No action is needed, and the apps will work exactly as they do today.

Bitwarden remains committed to open source security and transparency
The GPLv3 OSS licensed version continues to be updated and published on GitHub
All current features are available in both versions
License details are on GitHub
Bitwarden remains committed to a robust, free forever plan for everyone

If you have any questions, please ask them in this thread. Thanks all!

EDIT:

Bitwarden is not going closed-source
You can still fork Bitwarden
No change to self-hosting, the licensing change affects those who are repackaging and reselling Bitwarden
The free plan is here to stay permanently
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] teezeh@ieji.de 34 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

@Mustachius_Grumpius “The GPLv3 OSS licensed version continues to be updated and published on GitHub

All current features are available in both versions

License details are on GitHub

Bitwarden remains committed to a robust, free forever plan for everyone”

[–] Mustachius_Grumpius@thelemmy.club 59 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

yeah but its typical double speak

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] terabyterex@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

all "current" features. further down its asked about the future and they arent always clear but the fo state there wont be feature parity moving forward

[–] giant_smeeg@feddit.uk 32 points 3 weeks ago

Yup. All CURRENT, these will start to diverge...

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If there is no intention to put the screws to the user base, then why do it on the first place?

We all know how this game ends when venture capital gets involved.

[–] teezeh@ieji.de 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Split versions is usually the first step. Many projects have done so before. Next year there will be some technical reason they can't keep feature parity with the commercial repository, and it will drift from the OSS repository. Oops, we broke compatibility, sowwy guys. A couple of years later the OSS repository will be closed because it is a security risk. By that point the company and management would've drifted so far from the initial values of the project that people won't notice. Those who cared will have jumped ship to alternatives sooner, those who noticed later will be already too deep into depending on the software that they will keep paying the subscription.

I have no evidence, but I also don't have any doubts this is the plan.

[–] freely1333@reddthat.com 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I kinda thought the paid plan already had extra features no? Like silly ones but I swear it isn’t just donations right?

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It had cloud storage, built in TOTP with autofill, and some had features like organizations and sharing

Still, this fucking sucks. Bitwarden was literally created as a ln answer to this shit happening to LastPass and Dashlane.

[–] freely1333@reddthat.com 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I get it because minio dying burned me hard but so long as it keeps operating as it does now do we need more features? I would be fine with a continuously secure version of exactly what it does now. I kinda hate feature bloat

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If it’s not getting security updates and it’s not ona completely airgapped sysyem it’s a huge liability. Especially something that lives at the storage level.

Aren’t there forks being maintained? I was looking at implementing it right before it went enshitty, and I could have sworn there were alternatives…

[–] freely1333@reddthat.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

I meant features on Bitwarden etc. meaning maintenance to me on an app like this is fine. Minio happened too quickly for good alternatives to exist but yes people jumped on getting some together pretty quickly.

It was, if anything, lesson in treating a single FOSS as a solved problem.