this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)
Ask Lemmygrad
1394 readers
3 users here now
A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
from the "USSR sphere of influence countries" i'd say Romania. it was still a lot better than what it was before but it had a lot of issues
cw: reddit prolespod did an episode on them
I vehemently disagree with saying that Romania was the worst. The comment you quote gives plenty of positives and reasons why it was in fact not the worst and many of the criticisms expressed are just as valid of other socialist states, e.g. Yugoslavia getting in bed with the IMF, or even China siding with the US over the USSR.
Most telling of all is the admission that, unlike in other socialist states where the revisionist governments just rolled over and accepted their own abolition, the West had to orchestrate an entire bloody coup and fake "revolution" to murder him. Why, if he was such a bad socialist (and thus a non-danger to the counter-revolution) was he not treated like other former socialist leaders in Europe post 1989 who were too insignificant and powerless to even be worth killing or imprisoning?
And what is the line at which a socialist country "pushes the nationalist agenda too much"? Does China do too much nationalism when it celebrates its millennia long history? Does the DPRK?
It is inconsistent to at the same time accuse Romania for distancing itself too much from the USSR (China did so even more, btw), while at the same time admitting that the revisionist Soviet leadership directly colluded with Western imperialists to overthrow and murder Romania's leader (as they clearly also allowed the other counter-revolutions in Eastern Europe to occur)?
It's also strange to criticize Romanian socialism for such relatively (in the broader picture) petty things when there is one huge and glaring error made by them that i consider to be actually inexcusable and that has not even been mentioned here: Romania's involvement with the Zionist project.
yes there were still plenty positives.
they did the same IMF fuckery as Yugoslavia did, got the same issues with rationing and lack of goods as Poland did and did away with women's autonomy by making abortion illegal.