this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2026
14 points (55.1% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1904 readers
141 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YPTB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is going to be a fun one.

So here are the facts:

I commented on a news article about a mother and adult son charged with incest (and adultery as well for her.) This is what I said:

Someone responded to me and I replied before I realized my original comment was removed for being inappropriate. Then I added the edit when I saw.

The next day I discovered I'd been banned from that community for "pro-incest comments" and several others I don't think I've ever been in for rule 4 violations. The orignal post was removed.

You can see those here:

Site rule 4 is: Usernames or posts/comments containing transphobia, homophobia, sexism, racism, ableism, zionism, anti-veganism, or trivializing COVID. No self-described or obvious fascists, conservatives, or reactionaries.

My comments had none of those things. I'd even go so far as to say my banning was reactionary.

Now, I'm not defending incest, especially not for myself. My problem is with puritanical laws interfering with the private sex lives of people. In my original comment I stated that grooming was a separate issue and should be dealt with, but that there is nothing inherently wrong with incest. That is, enthusiastic consensual sex between capable adults.

I know someone will bring up the Hapsburgs, so yes, children of incest should be avoided.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Legalized incest very much does facilitate rape because of grooming.

No, sorry, again, criminalization of grooming does not require criminalization of incest, and criminalization of incest does not address all incidence of grooming. Grooming must be criminalized separately, because not all grooming is via an incestuous relationship. The legal status of incest has no bearing on grooming. Grooming is not at all relevant to the circumstances OP discusses.

You could’ve just said, “No, I can’t find a single case, I’m just whining about a problem that doesn’t exist.”

I could have, but that would be dishonest. Jail is not the only possible consequence. Before homosexuality was decriminalized, you would have had a hard time finding people admitting to knowing people who had been jailed for it. Before homosexuality was decriminalized, you didn't have a lot of homosexual looking for marriage licenses, for example.

Bigotry is always a problem regardless of whether you can name a victim of it.

Hey, I appreciate the discussion. This has honestly been fun. We should do it again sometime.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 weeks ago

No, sorry, again, criminalization of grooming does not require criminalization of incest

Again you keep harping on "requiring," something I never said. Incest does facilitate grooming.

Before homosexuality was decriminalized, you would have had a hard time finding people admitting to knowing people who had been jailed for it.

I didn't ask "do you know someone this happened to" I asked "has this ever happened?" I can absolutely find cases of people being jailed for homosexuality from before it was decriminalized.

Bigotry is always a problem regardless of whether you can name a victim of it

Is it? Is there any other form of "bigotry" where you can't name a victim?

Hey, I appreciate the discussion. This has honestly been fun. We should do it again sometime.

Gotta say that it's strange that you enjoy talking to bigots. But I guess victimless bigotry is lower stakes.