this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2026
16 points (100.0% liked)
Opensource
6708 readers
87 users here now
A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!
⠀
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Is an SMB share just to difficult to figure out or something?
To be fair setting up a user account for a random file is a nuisance.
I run a simple web server for just this purpose. Anyone in the net can access my software folder via any browser, download whatever they need. Windows/Linux/Android apps, scripts, etc.
This way no user account is needed, I just send them a link. And the files are well-isolated by both the share the webserver connects through (read only) and then users can only access the files through the web server which doesn't have any change capability.
Unironically, yes.
I used to have every device on my network connected via smb share. Either I did something completely wrong or the protocol is just dog slow. Switched to filebrowser quantum with local mDNS resolution and haven't looked back. Now when I need to move files from pc to pc over the network I just navigate in a browser to http://files.local/ and download them on the client machine. It is also significantly more friendly for my (non-techie) partner who often uses it to grab music from our shared digital music library to put on their MP3 player.
I've never had an issue with smb being slow. I do have an issue on my linux machines where it wont show thumbnail previews which is pretty annoying but I've never been bothered by it enough to figure out why.
Smb is shit