this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

1389 readers
8 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Even after the recent Hukou reforms, permanent residency for immigrants is nonexistant (less than 20k in the past 2 decades). It feels like such a huge own-goal in the current historical moment to miss out on attracting migrants, especially the now unemployed technical experts and scientists in deindustrializing nations. Have they perhaps been infuenced by the current wave of fascist hysteria in the G7? (By which I mean: the CPC proactively stopping such a movement from forming in China?) Are they high on their own supply about being a "civilizational state"? Are they scared? Are they CHUDS?

Edit: It genuinely doesn't make economic sense at this point. For example, West Europe would honestly be a sterile crater at this point without immigrants from the past 20 years due to population decline.

The best reason I could come up with is that they fear backlash from the precariously employed youths and xenophobic elders.

Edit: Historical inertia is probably a large factor here. It would be somewhat strange to switch from population control to population bolstering policies in under 2 decades.

Edit 2: Vietnam is somewhat similar to China in governance, but is more leinient with immigration than even Europe.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pcalau12i@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago

Immigration isn't a stable economic policy. Yes, when some countries like the USA get big, they start suffering from labor shortages which they offset with immigration. But what about when the countries that the immigrates come from get big? Who is going to immigrate to their country? It's fundamentally an unsustainable policy, and the US and EU sustains it by keeping those countries poor, by constantly attacking them, toppling their governments, bombing them, etc, so people will flee those countries into the US and EU.

China doesn't do that, it invests heavily into trying to keep its neighbors stable, so it needs a more sustainable policy for long-term development rather than a quick and unsustainable band-aid fix. It is not "progressive" to bomb a country then take in their refugees. It is progressive to invest in the country to give the people there a reason to stay, i.e. like the Belt & Road Initiative.