this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2026
144 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
1330 readers
99 users here now
For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.
Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable
Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.
Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.
The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up
Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)
Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term
Media owners, CEOs and/or board members
Monitor every stock trade Congress and the White House makes
Meme to Explain the GOP "Shepherd Model"
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Those side effects are all for intravenous administration, not ingestion.
And before you handwave it away remember that the difference between "life giving beverage" and "drowning" is in how water is administered.
More detail on side effects below. Note the bolded sentence in the first paragraph. If a fatal side effect can occur from topical use, do you really think it's safe to eat?
There's a reason it's been banned since the 90s for use in livestock, and the reason is BECAUSE IT CAN KILL PEOPLE if not administered by a medical professional.
My question to you is why would you try to minimize the risk? Do you want people to get sick and die?
Again - topical use is not ingestion. And this is a case where dose matters as well. The amount you would ingest from meat that has been cooked is going to be very different from the amount you would be applying topically as a medicine.
That's you're reading - not my meaning. You don't get a pass on "factually correct" just because your inaccuracy supports a conclusion you like.
It is your meaning and purpose if you're minimizing a fatal risk, one that every western country, including fucking ARGENTINA where this toxic beef comes from, has laws against.
FOR 30 FUCKING YEARS.
Do you really think you're smarter than the scientific community's consensus for 30 yeas? When someone takes your shitty advice, and dies because of a bad reaction, will you realize what you're saying then?
Hell, would you eat a burger with this crap in it?
Take some goddamn responsibility for your words or STFU.
And I'm not. I'm saying the data you provided to back up that assertion is wrong and/or bad.
No - I'm saying the data you've provided to back up that assertion is wrong and/or bad.
I'm not saying anything like that. I'm saying the data you've provided to back up that assertion is wrong and/or bad.
Same to you.