this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2026
5 points (100.0% liked)

interestingasfuck

9893 readers
352 users here now

For exceptionally interesting content

Rules:

  1. Posts must be interesting
  2. Posts must be based in reality
  3. No hateful content
  4. No harmful content
  5. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

its amazing how we look at historical constructions and assume thats always how it looked.

You are right, The Pyramids used to be shining white beacons of marble, but the stone was.. "repurposed" for building after the end of the pharos.

Medieval castles too, all anyone sees today are grey, bare rock, dingy, cold, drafty castles.. But when they were new? before photographs and film? They were plastered white, and filled with rugs and tapestries that made them beautiful, stunning, and warm.

[โ€“] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A big thing missing from basically any old stone construction is all the wood.
If you see holes in the walls that's probably where wood beams were inserted to form floors, and the walls would probably be lined with wood on the inside as well. And, like.. Wooden furniture lol.
Like how the fuck do you put up paintings on stone walls? If you line it with wood you can just hammer in nails like normal.

I think churches are a great way to get an idea of what castles would look like in the past: Lots of decorations and colour, whole wood structures that are just missing now, and all the stone would probably be covered in whitewash or somesuch.