this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2026
245 points (99.6% liked)

Progressive Politics

4992 readers
5 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump’s closest aide, Natalie Harp, declined multiple times over more than a year to seek a routine security clearance normally obtained by West Wing staffers to work at the White House, according to two people familiar with the matter.

Both people said Harp’s reasoning for declining to complete the process was unknown. After concerns mounted among the White House counsel’s office and security officials, the president himself intervened, and Harp in recent months filled out the forms to launch a formal federal background investigation and received the clearance, one of the people said.

The lack of a security clearance is one of several red flags raised about Harp internally by Trump’s top aides since he returned to the White House in January 2025. Harp operates unusually close to the president and filters much of the information Trump sees on a daily basis, and that proximity has spurred frustration inside the West Wing, according to those two people and two other people granted anonymity to speak candidly about internal and sensitive dynamics.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Considering who is running things there, I don't get why anyone else's security clearance even matters, other than maybe increased bandwidth.

It should just be assumed that all national secrets are known by whoever offered money for them and any security that remains is likely more through obscurity than because of any clearance requirements.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because we want whatever parts of our government not being actively interfered with to work correctly? Because it’s yet another charge that should be levied against whoever let that happen? Because historians will have a fun challenge trying to compile a complete list of illegal activities by this administration, and how they somehow made themselves above the law? Yet another point against Mitch McConnell as the second worst person in history to sabotage the us?

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's like worrying about a leaky faucet when the building is engulfed in flames.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I think of it as I want the smoke detectors to work even when the building is engulfed in flames, in the hope that it will save some lives