this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2026
106 points (91.4% liked)
PC Gaming
15857 readers
1373 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Please stop giving him attention. He plastered his shitty crypto coin everywhere on all leaks from like 2023. He clearly has different agenda, not "protecting the gamers". Dude is doing a crypto exit scam.
Eh, it's not like anybody's actually got the sack to post the leaked video. The fact that they're hiding it doesn't necessarily mean they disagree with his politics/crypto bullshit, but it does mean they aren't supporting his activity.
Well, this aged like milk
Can you please elaborate? I stopped following the dude, but he kept posting leaks from 2023 build. Did he get the 2026 build or something?
In the 3rd leaked video, the radio was playing a song that was released in 2025. This confirms that the leaker probably has a build made around 2025.
I am not PCGamer lol, email them about it 🤣
If you didn't want comments, why post?
the cool thing about piefed&pylova, is that I read both your unedited undeleted comments.
If a Journal make the mistake giving attention to a scammer, why does a threadie have to attend to the Journal’s mistake.
Did you just came off internet class or something? I am just another crossposter. @inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world was the first to give the scammer a 🔁.
I did tell @redacted@infosec.pub who a is supposed to address, if a really wants to correct the Journal’s mistake. Everyone else that upranked a’s comment can do so as well.
But yes, you can absolutely comment something addressing me, that I did. Otherwise I wouldn't have left the «🔔Notify about replies» enabled.
This has got to be a fuckin bot.
Because I replied to your tomfoolery?
Or because you fear the consequences of libeling me responsible for a Jornal‘s mistake?
I'm not trying to bully you or bandwagon you, into not posting.
But you have to acknowledge your own free will. No one made you crosspost this. And no one is preventing you from addressing concerns with the leaker's motives in whatever way you deem fit: be that deleting the post or editing the OP to include those concerns.
Saying the equivalent of "someone else messed up, so it's fine if I don't clean up" is a shiftless ideology. It is neither a good nor a popular position to debate from.
Then take it up with the first responders. I found all of this silly, so I 🔁.
I am unsure if you caught up, but our scammer released a build.