this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
338 points (91.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

27550 readers
24 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nefara@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Krita, definitely, though it's still not as complete in capability it's a much better analogue

[–] thal3s@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Seconded. Krita is significantly easier to use then GIMP.

[–] black0ut@pawb.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Krita is mostly for digital artists and digital painting, while GIMP is more for image editing. They aren't made for the same purpose, even though both can do simple stuff from both worlds.

[–] lyrial@anarchist.nexus 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Except easily drawing circles on GIMP's part.

[–] black0ut@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago

Yeahhh, I never understood that. It can't be that difficult to make a circle tool, right?

To be honest, I don't know how difficult it would really be, and I know it can be done with plugins. I also know it's not a tool that you end up using that much with the more advanced workflows (I myself haven't really needed it in a long time), but it would be nice if we had it.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Isn't krita for painting and photoshop for photo editing? Does krita do RAW, color grading and such?

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

yes they are two different use cases.