this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
500 points (99.0% liked)

politics

31341 readers
2547 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 62 points 2 months ago (3 children)

...and the only punishment was closing the accounts?

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 48 points 2 months ago (4 children)

What else is the bank supposed to do. I get what you're saying though. The slow-ass courts will probably never do anything about it

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 months ago

If you or I get a bank account shut down for money laundering concerns someone will be at the door the same day to tall to us face to face about it and we'd be facing around 10 years in prison.

If rich fucks in suits do it they seem to just close the account and move on

[–] artyom@piefed.social 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Report it to the FBI? Or IRS? Or any number of 3-letter agencies?

[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I'm sure Kash will get right to investigating this after releasing the Epstein files.

But yes, I get it. We'd be hearing about this for the next 2.5 years if this was Biden.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is from 2021. There was no Kash. Regardless, what the gov does is not their responsibility. Their responsibility is to report it.

[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Oh okay. So this is just yet another Garland fumble.

[–] vapordays@leminal.space 4 points 2 months ago

They're too busy investigating the leader of Antifa for giving people things to read

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 2 points 2 months ago

Well they could prosecute him when his term ends but they'll never convict before he becomes president again in 2032.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

"He's already been punished. How much more could a person possibly suffer than surviving one of their bank accounts closing?!"

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 6 points 2 months ago

It was 300 accounts. It's not clear, but sometimes AML closures means they take all the money.

That could have been millions or billions of dollars that Trump lost. That's quite significant..

[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

His DOJ or FBI is never going to build a laundering case against him, and the senate isn’t going to convict him without 2/3 vote. The proper way to do this would’ve been to monitor the accounts, build up a case, then seize all the funds/transaction records as evidence while convicting him.

The bank is simply covering their ass.