this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
44 points (71.2% liked)
Bluesky
2054 readers
1 users here now
People skeeting stuff.
Bluesky Social is a microblogging social platform being developed in conjunction with the decentralized AT Protocol. Previously invite-only, the flagship Beta app went public in February 2024. All are welcome!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Don't two of these people have multiple accusers across some amount of time, while one has a disgruntled ex-wife, who was found liable for defamation for her claims?
I had covid during the Depp-Heard trial and ended up watching the whole thing. I recommend watching both of Amber's testimonies to anyone who feels like believing the mainstream media narrative on the entire spectacle. Nothing dispels belief in her accusations quite as quickly as watching her recount her story.
That whole mess was a complicated tangle of a clusterfuck and neither of them came out of it clean.
Regardless, all his shit, especially with Marilyn Manson, makes me think he's a gross fucking creep. I wouldn’t want to be alone with him.
I honestly don't know know enough about a Manson connection to have an informed opinion.
Unfortunately I find that after Amber Heard, I'm more likely to need some supporting evidence or corroboration in any celebrity cases to feel comfortable expressing a view in any direction.
The victim complex of this guy LOL. You got manipulated into siding with the wifebeater Johnny Depp. Live up to it.
Pretty sure that whole thing was two rich cunts fighting. They both looked like pieces of shit out for vengeance that entire time.
Didn't his wife shit in their bed?
Someone did. Theres no caught in 4k for that. The only thing that was verified was they're both different kinds of abusers.
It was an abuser and a victim. Amber was the victim and Depp the abuser.
Yeah sure I'll believe your internet words over my own eyes and ears.
As I said, please go and watch nothing but Amber's own words in the trial. They're readily available on YouTube.
I had no interest in the case before I was fully wiped out by covid for several weeks and ended up watching the entire trial. I don't have an opinion on on the two of them as actors and I don't follow Hollywood anything, really. I hadn't even heard of the whole thing before my sister suggested watching the opening statements when I complained about not having the energy to do anything but rot.
It's a little sad, in my opinion, that leftist spaces are so heavily against any critical view of this case. I have no problem with believing victims and taking immediate steps to protect them. But when majority of the evidence points to her words being outright lies, I struggle to reconcile that with a world-view based on critical thinking.
If all neutral (as in unconnected to either one of the parties) witnesses give an extremely different account than one party, wouldn't you conclude that that person is not being truthful?