this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2026
328 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

86695 readers
3154 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is not the kind of case that goes in front of a jury.

[–] Sirdubdee@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because it's a question about the constitutionality of whether or not they were within their rights to violate his.

This is a question for judges.

[–] Sirdubdee@piefed.social 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Oh I’m talking down the line if this ever gets to a jury trial. Not literally at this point.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Still not an option because jurors are not supposed to know about jury nullification and lawyers are not allowed in any way shape or form to suggest it.

There is in fact a current case in the UK, which is the legal system that the US has based itself on, in regards to a lawyer insinuating jury nullification during their closing remarks. The lawyer is being held in contempt and is now awaiting their own trial for that.