World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
No, but it claimed the North. You're deliberately ignoring my point which is that the claims, both ways, are bluster.
More or less, yes. There are exceptions and hats off to them. I wish my country had the balls but selling some butter (which I've seen in supermarkets in China) is more important to them.
China will cut off ties if you don't recognise the one China policy. Even the US accepts it for trade purposes, all while arming the shit out of Taiwan to defend itself from annexation and maintaining heavy ambiguity on whether they'll defend Taiwan.
Provably false.
Those "exceptions" just recognise the government in Taipei as the government of China. They don't recognise Taiwan as being separate from China, just the government there to be in Charge of China. They simply just didn't recognise the legitimacy of the PRC after the civil war.
It's literally called "The Republic of China". They used the pre-1949 Chinese flag. The article you mentioned:
It says they recognises the ROC's government as China's. Not as Taiwan being a country.
Taiwan has not declared independence.
The Republic of Ireland claimed Northern Ireland, a part which claimed to be a part of the United Kingdom and is claimed and administered by the United Kingdom. The Republic of Ireland did not claim England, Scotland, or Wales.
In addition, Northern Ireland is part of Ireland in a geographical context. (And this is coming from someone who got back from an Ulster Unionist parade a few hours ago) It's still not really comparable as the Northern Ireland executive doesn't claim jurisdiction of the other 26 historical counties of Ireland.
If for example Northern Ireland wasn't a part of the UK, and it claimed the true government of Ireland was seated in Stormont, claiming the other 26 aforementioned counties, while Dublin still claimed authority over the 6 counties in Northern Ireland, then yes it would be comparable. In addition especially if both governments claimed "you can recognise me but not the other" However that's not what's happening and never was the case.
It's more comparable with North Korea and South Korea. Both claim jurisdiction over each other and style themselves as a government of Korea. Their civil war is on an indefinite ceasefire just like China's, but they allow countries to recognise both governments simultaneously.
The USA doesn't actually recognise the DPRK regime as being legitimate, so would hold the position that Seoul is the rightful owner of the entire peninsula. Meanwhile the UK has relations with both, including embassies in their respective capitals.
Omg. Listen to yourself.
This is the last thing I'll address because you're being deliberately obtuse now and just parroting the same, dull, seemingly deliberately naive takes.
That's ignoring the countries that recognise them. That nomenclature is from history. Same as the Irish claim on the North. If they called themselves the Republic of Taiwan, China would invade post haste. Like this is twelve year old child level obvious.
You're bringing nothing to the discussion that you haven't already said and the .uk suffix coupled with such apology for an obviously independent nation smells so bad of a bad actor that I'm out.
That's not really relevant, as they don't do that. And the same thing would happen in the USA if Texas started calling itself a country, or California, etc.
The idea that Taiwan isn't a part of China has never featured as a serious geopolitical idea. The question was "which government is the government we recognise as that of China". Taiwanese independence is something which hasn't happened yet. You could support movements that support it (kind of a weird thing for a foreigner to support a foreign separatist movement but you do you) but it hasn't happened yet. And I don't see why it would need to. Sure, Taiwan is a part of China in which the communists haven't captured, and I don't believe reigniting that war is a good idea - the cost of human life would be huge - but Taiwan itself isn't a country, the Taiwan Area is just ruled by a different government, but still a part of China. The Chinese civil war was never intended to divide or cut up the country, unlike the likes of the Irish rebellions which wanted to cut up the United Kingdom.