this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
81 points (95.5% liked)

Linux

14351 readers
595 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] fubarx@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Rust has a lot more 'batteries included' than C, and the memory ownership model works a lot better than garbage collection or C's YOLO model. It also has built-in async/await. But you're pretty much in the same boat as C when it comes to multiprocessing or thread-safety.

Anyone building a long-running backend service would be wise to take a serious look at Rust. Personally, I'm glad Linus is open to change and isn't digging his heels in on this one.

[โ€“] victorz@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I agree with you on Linus. Very pragmatic here, and for the benefit of all in the case of Rust in the kernel.

And thanks for sharing your insight!