this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
679 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

86412 readers
3441 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/49429587

URL for the crowdfunding: https://www.crowdsupply.com/oddly-specific-objects/open-book-touch

Specs:

  • Display: 4.26" e-paper touchscreen, 480 × 800 px, warm + cool frontlight
  • Processor: ESP32-S3 dual-core, Wi-Fi + Bluetooth LE
  • Memory: 16 MB flash, 8 MB PSRAM
  • Formats: EPUB and plain text, no DRM
  • Storage: microSD card slot
  • Interface: USB-C with integrated LiPo charging
  • Dimension: 78 × 120 × 10 mm, about 85 g
  • Open source: MIT-licensed firmware, open hardware (to be released at shipping)

It also has a replaceable 800 mAh battery, I found it cool :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Why is "buttonless" being said like a good thing?

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It’s a fact? It has no buttons. God or bad

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but my point was that it was stated in a way like a feature being touted as opposed just a statement of fact, Maybe my impression was wrong, but "buttonless" immediately put me off from the device.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Might be listed as a warning for those of us that prefer button interfaces

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 5 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Because buttons take space, reducing space available for the screen that has, well, the book.

The good sensor is the answer, IMO. I only wonder how should it turn on and off, then.

[–] oats@piefed.zip 8 points 2 days ago

Having a space with no display where I can actually hold the reader makes it so much better, for me

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Buttons can go on the side or back...

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Sure. But would that be convenient?

I hold nothing against buttons if people really want them, but many others would just prefer a larger touchscreen, and this seems to be the target audience here.

[–] natecox@programming.dev 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes. Buttons on the sides are awesome. The Kobo libre ergonomics are fantastic even for troll-handed people like myself.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago

Then yeah, by all means

[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hall sensor/ reed switch and it turns off when it's idle or the case closes?

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago

I think it is definitely a matter of preference. I dislike touchscreens in general for user interfaces. I previous ereader used a touchscreen and swiping to turn pages and I absolutely hated it. I was glad to get back to having buttons to control pages as well as settings.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago

yeah I like buttons and connectors. You can put plenty without making a chunky device.