this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
1043 points (98.4% liked)

People Twitter

10282 readers
915 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. If you replace the "x" at their site with xcancel (so it beomes xcancel.com), and you're not on mobile, it will save video. https://web.archive.org/save is another great option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
  7. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@piefed.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sometimes I wonder if women's lib was only successful because it happened to align with the capitalist desire to double the labor pool. Is that too cynical? Maybe we still would've gotten there otherwise.

[–] Whelks_chance@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's irritating that you used to be able to run a 2.4 children household on a male breadwinner, and now two incomes is often not enough. We've normalised everyone working and noone able to focus on home and the family.

I guess the idea of the "stay at home dad" didn't take off enough to normalise a single worker after women were able to leave the house.

(I'm aware of the broad strokes hetronormative language here, but it's relevant)

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago

I guess the idea of the “stay at home dad” didn’t take off enough to normalise a single worker after women were able to leave the house.

Part of that is women's wages didn't rise to match men's wages.