this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
29 points (100.0% liked)
Programming
27603 readers
95 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Do I understand correctly that this has all the building blocks which make up various lossless compression schemes (dictionaries, run length encoding, delta encoding, etc) and kit bashes them together for your specific dataset?
I was under the impression that modern file formats and compression schemes already kind of do that as part of the normal compression process, so I was a little surprised by how much they beat some of the competition in their benchmarks.
It can only do the impressive numbers after you give it a schema for the data, and the data has to be structured in a way that follows a rigid schema, so it's not magic.
Webassembly for compression or something, but it's made by the zstd people so maybe it will turn out to be magic eventually.
On one hand the x2.06 ratio for the SAO data is extremely good, zpaq and paq8px are 50x and 10000x slower at encoding and decoding and still can't even reach that ratio (I didn't try even more extreme compression, paq8px -8 already took 20 minutes).
On the other hand,