this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2026
901 points (95.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

48602 readers
1214 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I personally do, he actually risked his life to release information about the government spying on people. And there are for sure more advanced ways now. Even your phone is listening.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Garbagio@lemmy.zip 47 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's hard to say he's a hero, but, what he did was undoubtedly heroic.

[–] Ougie@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If doing something heroic does not make you a hero then what does?

[–] Garbagio@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would say inspiring people. Not that anyone should be held to that standard, mind you; I don't begrudge Edward for fucking off to Russia. One heroic deed is certainly more than most, and I think the world would be a better place if more people rose to the occasion. But to call him a hero? Idk. I personally wouldn't.

[–] Ougie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can you give an example of someone you would call a hero?

[–] Garbagio@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd say a well known example is Greta Thunberg. She's consistently stood up for good things at the cost of her health and safety, and while (no offense) nothing has been at the level of exposing a global surveillance apparatus, she has consistently engaged with the world, rolling each action into her public persona, only to use that persona to garner even more attention to her next action. I know Snowden clearly performed an extraordinary act at the cost of his own health and safety; truly a heroic action. And again, I mean this as no slight, dude did more than most; dude is well within his rights to go live as he wants. But, while I would say that Snowden has a consistency to his message, I wouldn't necessarily say he has consistency to his action.

[–] Ougie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You think him fleeing to Russia is inconsistent? It seems to me that the organizations he's exposed are the sort of outfits that would murder someone like him, so in order to stay alive I don't know what other choices he would've had.

Agree on Greta btw, but to continue with the same example, I would say that killing a little girl is less likely, because it would create a martyr. And if she were ever in danger I wouldn't hold it against her if she chose to disappear somewhere. She's already done more than enough.

My point being, I don't necessarily see the difference, and I'm a bit confused at the apparent hesitation to label Snowden a hero. Tempted to assume that the smear campaign is working even in these circles.

[–] Garbagio@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bro if you're just looking to pick a fight, I'm not engaging

[–] Ougie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I'm genuinely asking wtf?

[–] ThanksObama@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nope. You can do a great deed and still be a shitty person.

[–] Ougie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Are you saying Snowden is a shitty person? If so, why, what's he done?

[–] ThanksObama@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Nope. That goes for everyone.

[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's not. Unless you think taking a job to protect your country is "shitty"

[–] Ougie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not saying anything. The thread is about Snowden and you said one can do great things and still be a shitty person, so I'm trying to understand what you mean.

[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago