this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
252 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

85400 readers
5103 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nbsp@programming.dev 80 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

Not really. Workers are left taking the blame for forced implementation from the executive level. They save the costs and work staff harder... But when it fucks up then the workers can take the blame. Responsibility for this needs to sit higher up with those who forced faulty tools on everyone. AI is being forced into the NHS against all protests and objections.

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Doctors are not like developers. The heads of organizations treat them differently, because their job prospects are better. If they say no, it's a no.

Ref: Trying to get doctors in hospital systems to use life-saving notifications for years.

[–] KingKong33@lemmy.ml 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Then they have an obligation to fight back. Or they can lose their job because they blindly followed AI.

[–] Stopwatch1986@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

And resistance can only be collective. Another reason unionisation is as important as it's ever been.

[–] valkyre09@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I thought the NHS had a pretty good union, no?

[–] Stopwatch1986@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago

It is but creeping privatisation may change that, as does legislation becoming more hostile to unionisation since the 1980s.

The broader point is that individuals can try all they want to preserve their privacy, but then friends, family and organisations spy on them, often unwittingly, eg when we share with them calendar events or email messages. The only way forward is collective resistance, building alliances and influencing public policy. But it's always been like that with systemic issues.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Does the "following orders" defense work sometimes?

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Especially if you have archived that email saying ftfu and AI. I've been hoarding these since this idiocy started.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Only when standards are not at their highest? If so, that wouldn't look good.

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 days ago

Any doctor using an LLM or ML algorithm for anything but analysing huge quantities of data deserves to be lambasted

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 5 points 2 days ago

Workers are left taking the blame for forced implementation from the executive level.

Are the individual workers being sued, or is the hospital?

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I can understand this to some degree, but I largely disagree.

AI is a tool. The user of the tool should be the one that carries responsibility. I don't have the stats, but I imagine that most jobs that relied on hand tools suffered more injury when power tools were introduced, but again, it's up to the person using the tool to use it responsibly.

Granted, thats not a perfect analogy because AI definitely doesn't present the same marked improvements as power tools, but the responsibility of the user doesn't change.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The power tools are faulty, and they're being forced to use them. You're assuming the people using the AI have the power to reject what the AI says. I'm not sure that's true.

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Now that they're personally liable for what it outputs, they definitely can. Your boss can't force you to break the law.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago

I love how the AI booster narrative for using it shifted so quickly from "buh it it will make medicine better!" to "it's the doctor's fault when it fails!"

Or maybe that's the point. Heap unwarranted praise at the feet of the AI corpos, shift all externalities and blame onto the victims.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 2 days ago

Being liable for medical malpractice and breaking the law are almost completely mutually exclusive.

It's almost always a civil suit, often between insurance companies.

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Well, if you want to lose your job, you're right!