this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
63 points (98.5% liked)

Selfhosted

59905 readers
673 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
ayyy@sh.itjust.works
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world
63
Security considerations about hosting Immich from home (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by Maroon@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

So far, my self-hosting has been limited to Pi-Hole, and a static website. I now want to try out something new, an Immich server.

I have a static IP from my ISP, so I don’t need to rent out a VPS. However, given that this IS a home internet, I want to be extra sure that it is going to be secure.

In my existing website, I use Fail2Ban + BadBotBlocker + Anubis + Nginx rate limits to protect it from scrapers, bots and malicious users, and it works well. With photos (especially family photos) at stake, I just want to know more on how to protect my server.

Add: thanks for the helpful replies. I will be sharing the photos with family, many of whom live abroad.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] androidul@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

assuming that you’re to expose that to the Internet, my recommendation is to deploy only

complicate the setup too much and it’s going to rather be more painful to maintain and also much easier to misconfigure.

The WAF covers OWASP Top 10 so that should give you around 70% protection which is still better than nothing