this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
73 points (96.2% liked)
Opensource
6217 readers
65 users here now
A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!
⠀
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Comparison with closed source software sometimes does. If I installed windows I would pay nothing. If I got a computer with Windows preinstalled I would pay a price premium less than $50, perhaps even negative. And buying it from Microsoft costs significantly more. So how much should I pay Arch? Paying $50 for something I get for free feels like I'm being had.
You might say that I can then pay smaller amounts regularly. But aren't subscriptions shunned when it's for closed source software?
Then who should I donate to? I've donated to Arch, Kde and the lemmy instances I use. But what about like Linux itself? Browsers I use? The weather app? Upstream libraries of those projects? How much should each get? Kde already gets more money than they can spend. Should the amount be based on how much value I receive or how much they need it?
And once those are decided then I need to find how to donate. It's easier to just not
First part of your logic I respectfully disagree. Don't forget that most of those proprietary software don't make money by your payment, but by your data. You are the product yada yada. I do not therefore expect a "lower price" for software that doesn't track and serve me more ads with a shovel. The fact that I get it for free and can choose to pay (donate) for it is an amazing plus.
Second part I fully agree though. A simple example for me is: Linux distro > KDE > Firefox > Lemmy > PeerTube instance > Content Creator. It gets out of hand really fast.
No you're absolutely right. What I described is more of a gnawing fear that I'm not being smart worth my money