this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

Share Funny Videos, Images, Memes, Quotes and more

3299 readers
4 users here now

#funny

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fancy_Gecko@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Acknowledging a metro station in the middle of nowhere, in response to circulating pictures of it, is not really misleading at all. Headlines matter in getting people to read your article. The headline is accurate, and the article doesn't ridicule the station, it just addresses it.

[–] deathmetaldawgy@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The misleading part is “middle of nowhere” instead of “active construction site planned to house x million people in the future” because that would make it look like a future plan instead of dystopian. I think you’re lying if you say you don’t understand that’s what this article/headline is implying.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You can think what you like, but that's a deeply paranoid perspective. It's just normal light journalism. Context matters.

[–] deathmetaldawgy@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh, so now I’m paranoid! Sure, context matters and that’s exactly why this being out of context is negative framing at best; that’s not paranoid and it’s how media works, you can generate more clicks based on your headlines and thumbnails & that’s why things are framed certain ways.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, paranoid. In this specific case, the station had already gone viral for being in the middle of nowhere. That was not an original framing by the author, it was an existing framing that they gave context for. If anything, their framing is positive, since they explained that while it looked bizarre, it had a rational explanation.

Maybe if they came up with the "middle of nowhere" framing themself, you'd have a point. But they didn't.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago

How can you simultaneously play dumb and act condescending?