this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

networking

3630 readers
1 users here now

Community for discussing enterprise networks and the ensuing chaos that comes after inheriting or building one.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Looking for feedback on Wireguard capable wifi routers that keep a persistent link from the router to an endpoint. A lot of what I see advertised as "Wireguard Supported" sets up a server and not a client.

The GL.iNET routers seem to do it, anyone with experience with these? https://docs.gl-inet.com/router/en/4/interface_guide/wireguard_client/

Bonus for being able to push a wireguard client config to the device via API/cli.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pulsar@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Easy to configure in a GL.iNET with OpenWRT under the hood. For a more flexible router at the cost of a steep learning curve go with Mikrotik.

[–] uenticx@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Good to hear mikrotik fans here ... if there wasn't an abundance of Cisco equipment at my work I would be buying these for personal use instead, but these just wont die :P

This will be for less capable persons needing a wifi hotspot for access to CIDR restricted services on our side. Keeping it stupid simple like a GL.iNet GL-MT3000 for clients if they perform well.

[–] surfrock66@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Can you expand on that, I've been considering making a "portable network in a briefcase" situation, with a small router and a kodi box with just HDMI, Power, and Network coming out (for when the family travels; the kids connect to the same SSID and are on the home network by default). I hadn't started researching yet, but I am wondering if these support using Wifi as the WAN link, even with openWRT firmware? For example, if we're in a hotel, can I join this to hotel wifi with a captive portal, have it tunnel home, then the kids join it like a hotspot? I prefer openWRT and not vendor firmware because I trust patching the firmware more than I trust a vendor to upkeep their maintenance.

I'm looking at this: https://www.amazon.com/GL-iNet-GL-MT3600BE-Portable-Wireless-Computer/dp/B0GF1J99S4

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago

They do.
My setup is:
2 power adapters (the slate 7 came with 4 travel adapters. The other is for my chrecast
A chromecast + remote
A Slate 7 router

Internet can be supplied through Wifi as a repeater, as a MitM-AP and can also spoof the mac through which you can login into the captive-portal.

The Mudi7 can do all that + cellular with 2 SIMs (or 1 SIM + 1 eSIM)

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I bought a Mikrotik recently and it was terribly unstable. It would simply stop routing after 3 days on a test network with 1 device. Had to reboot it to get it to work again - no indication it had puked.

No strange config, all default other than a few IP settings.

Microtik needs time to mature.

[–] fourish@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Curious which MikroTik you had. I’ve been running them for years and absolutely rock solid. Right now a HEX-S refresh and it’s awesome and cheap.

It is complex to configure properly because it’s so powerful though. ChatGPT is great for debugging configs.