this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)
China
2717 readers
5 users here now
Discuss anything related to China.
Community Rules:
0: Taiwan, Xizang (Tibet), Xinjiang, and Hong Kong are all part of China.
1: Don't go off topic.
2: Be Comradely.
3: Don't spread misinformation or bigotry.
讨论中国的地方。
社区规则:
零、台湾、西藏、新疆、和香港都是中国的一部分。
一、不要跑题。
二、友善对待同志。
三、不要传播谣言或偏执思想。
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I guess it depends on perspective. A bus, in simplest terms, shortens a trip. People pay to take a bus for 10 minutes to save an hour walking. It seems this escalator fits a similar purpose in the transit system of the district. Save an hour climbing stairs by taking a 20 minute escalator ride. Not identical, but similar.
It is probably nearly free to run but the per rider upfront cost is probably much higher (construction costs, relatively low ridership). It's also a fairly unique solution, which means it does not benefit as much from standardization, though it seems most of the parts are standardized. Both of the systems would have operating labour costs in addition to the electrical costs (maintenance, IT support, financial etc.). I would love to see a full lifecycle cost breakdown comparison.
It could very well turn out that the escalator is way overpriced per ride, I just don't have the data to say with certainty. I just think that its not unreasonable when compared against other forms of public transit.