this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
51 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

4484 readers
781 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Has passed third Senate reading 15/4/2026

Has passed first House of Commons reading 30/4/2026.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I say this the the utmost contempt, so please read this in an aggressive and yelling voice:

WHY THE FUCK IS THE GOD DAMNED FUCKING BOOMER PUSHING FOR KAWS SHE DOESNT UNDERSTAND.

WHAT BOILED CAULIFLOWER EATING FUCKING MORONS DID THEY SURVEY FOR THIS.

Can we get some god damned informed people on government already? Jesus.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can we get some god damned informed people on government already? Jesus.

It's called direct democracy, & it’s based🚬

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is it? Because 80% of the country are numerically and technologically illiterate.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 2 points 1 week ago
  1. Now yar talking 2 different things. If you want informed folks making appropriate decisions informed folks need to be empowered to do so. Politicians precisely do not, since their praxis is to empower themselves above all information and reason. A direct democracy allows the informed access to act on informed actions. While a politician doesn't have to recall what they voted last bill.

  2. If you want more informed folks, that are capable counters & somewhat better technological literacy, you also need to directly mentor. More mentorships, less schooling. Direct democracy needs both to work.

  3. I pray you Canadians get your acts straighter than NaziSians. Fuck🖕oppressors.