this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2026
581 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

84459 readers
5134 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The recent surge in fuel prices due to the war in Iran has spurred demand for electric vehicles around the world, and Chinese car makers are making the most of the opportunity.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's what tariffs are for. There is no contradiction and no hypocrisy.

Nobody is against tariffs as a concept, every country protects some industry that is deemed critical (like agriculture) with tariffs and trade barriers. What people complain about are wholesale, generalized tariffs on everything from everywhere based on a ChatGPT suggestion.

Protecting a key industry like electric car manufacturing using tariffs is fine, using tariffs for everything because you just learned the word, is not.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Protecting a key industry like electric car manufacturing using tariffs is fine

We can't have affordable electric cars because Biden wanted to protect Elon's profits.

That's fine by you.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I never said my opinion about that, just said what tariffs are for.

Obviously protecting an industry makes prices go up, that's exactly the intended effect.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The intended effect was to protect a nazi's business interests at the expense of Americans. Mission accomplished.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Among others. Ford, GM, Rivian, Lucid, etc.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The important thing is that electric vehicles remain a luxury commodity.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

False. You can get a Nissan Leaf, a Chevy Bolt or an eGolf for under 5k.

Luxury electric vehicles remain a luxury commodity, sure.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Targeted temporary tariffs work best when you’re trying to develop an industry to catch up, such as Biden’s EV tax incentives to more quickly grow a larger market, infrastructure spending to speed buildout of chargers, manufacturing incentives to help legacy automakers transition, and a years long transition that manufacturers could plan around.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're giving biden the benefit of the doubt. You trust him.

I see a man who spent an entire year knowingly selling weapons for a genocide. I do not trust him. I do not give him the benefit of the doubt. As far as I'm concerned, the tariffs were to protect the business interests of the nazi Elon Musk alone, at the expense of the American people.

If centrists wanted me to be more charitable toward their wing of the party, they had their chance in 2024 to abide by the Leahy law. They chose genocide instead, and that choice defines them.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the single issue person coming to move the goalposts

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I was explaining why I don't ascribe benign motives to biden's actions.