this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
91 points (98.9% liked)

news

999 readers
979 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 18 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Also this bit

These costs could be ignored, or even accepted, if there was a clear idea of how precisely AI would streamline and improve the workplace

How about just improving life in general.

Work is not life.

Jobs are not life.

But even if it actually was perfect and actually intelligent and made work "easier" and more effixient, every single worked knows the end result will just be cutting jobs and making people work more.

If it makes every worker2x more efficient, its not going to be "oh, now you can all work 4 hours with your 2x output." Its going to be "half of you are fired and the rest of you work the same amount."