this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)
Linux and Tech News
3439 readers
1 users here now
This is where all the News about Linux and Linux adjacent things goes. We'll use some of the articles here for the show! You can watch or listen at:
You can also get involved at our forum here on Lemmy:
Or just get the most recent episode of the show here:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The batteries will be much more easily replaceable. This is a huge step forward. Yes, it would have been welcome from a user perspective but the legislation never mentioned hot-swappable.
This part pretty much makes it usless. While the improved battery life is good. Many current mid tier phones already have IP67 rating and It's going to be easier to just slap IP67 rating on the remainder with more adhesive.
That sounds like what we have right now, and these people are trying to move the goal posts, arguing that what we have right now is easily replaceable. They are trying to change the narrative to get around the legislation, to get you to accept their very specific terminology, to make it a technicality. Push against this please.
Can we even push back against it? We're random nobodys in the middle of ass-end of nowhere with no power or money to effect anything like that.
I'm not doubt that this small detail is going to get enough publicity to be noticed. People are already celebrating that soon they can start popping off the back panel and switch out the battery.
It's going to take at least few years to be noticed that nothing changed and by that time it's too late and most people have already forgotten that it was supposed to happen.