14
Why CES Advocates for Approval Voting Instead of RCV | Center for Election Science
(electionscience.org)
this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026
14 points (100.0% liked)
Work Reform
16205 readers
2 users here now
A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.
Our Philosophies:
- All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
- Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
- Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
- We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.
Our Goals
- Higher wages for underpaid workers.
- Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
- Better and fewer working hours.
- Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
- Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
First past the post inherently reinforcers a two party system as voting for a third party benefits the parties that you least want. That's the spoiler effect.
Approval voting doesn't have that problem, so alternatives can actually show up and be viable.
RCV (actually IRV) has less of a spoiler effect than FPTP but it still has a substantial "centre squeeze" effect as moderate candidates
with broad support but few first preference votes
get eliminated early.
There are much better voting systems that actually attempt to identify the Condorcet winner. The only advantage AV or IRV have over Condorcet methods is simplicity
Ranked pairs is better than ranked choice.