Europe
News and information from Europe ๐ช๐บ
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons), archive:is,ph,today (their JS DDoS websites)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)
view the rest of the comments
Here we go again ...
Every German nuclear power plant has been run with minimal maintenance for the remainder of their operational live because their shutdown had been decided years ago. It would have been more efficient to rebuild them from the ground up. It would have been if any of the major energy companies in Germany had been interested in operating new nuclear power plants at all.
Then there is the problem with nuclear waste. Yes, of course now someone will bring up the argument "It's so little waste" but even if it is, it's too much if there is no long term storage solution at all. Meanwhile, our existing waste containers are rusting away.
"But cheap electricity is worth it" I hear you say. Nuclear is not cheap. Every western nuclear power plant is propped up by government subsidies and guarantied electricity prices, which makes it a net negative for the taxpayer.
"But China is doing it on time and budget" is next in line. Sure, let's take the totalitarian state with total control over its industry as role model. But even China is adding magnitudes more renewables than nuclear capacity. Why wait decades for one nuclear power plants worth of energy when over the same time period we can add multiple nuclear plants worth of solar and wind farms together with the battery capacity to balance energy usage?
Next we have the issue of sourcing the fuel. Guess where i.e. France is getting most their fuel from? Yeah, it's Russia. "We could get our uranium from Australia instead" is the follow-up argument. Theoretically yes, but in reality France is even expanding their ties with Russia.
I really don't understand why people refuse to acknowledge that civilian nuclear power usage is a thing of the past.
You are so correct - those reactors were old. They were planned in the 70s and build in the 80s. They did reach the lifetime they were build for. We know that some countries are running really, really old reactors and we know that this is a really bad idea. And we know that building new reactors will take so long that we won't reach our climate goals.