this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
453 points (99.1% liked)

Android

33892 readers
10 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the Android community on Lemmy. Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If this can happen, is it possible that once mandatory developer verification comes into effect, all 3rd party apps will be uninstalled at first and require a re-install?

Concerning this specific case, NFCGate is a tool on which malware (family) titled NGate by ESET is based, thus likely causing a false positive.

Oh, and no bypass is available anymore (aside from disabling play protect):

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GreenCrunch@piefed.blahaj.zone 22 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I mean there is the problem of malicious apps on the Play Store (though that should be handled by Google reviewing submitted apps better). Maybe Play Protect could uninstall those once they're discovered? Seems a bit late. There's uninformed users being fooled into installing malicious APKs outside of the Play Store by blindly following malicious instructions, but Play Protect is just another step to follow.

I figure what's more valuable to Google is the marketing that Android is secure and a list of apps installed on your phone.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Google is a sellout hypocrite of the highest order and has been for...15, 18 years?

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Android being “open” was always just marketing. The truth is more complex and not as sellable.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Everyone tried to use the same model, even MacOS reboot sold itself as Unix and the open-source portion of the platform used to be much larger. You could edit a config file and make it load text console only in the early years.

Annoying, really, as every one of them preach openness until they get so big, and then they seal the gates because they think they have their market locked down.

Not anymore.

Will be interesting to see how android dies. It will be slow, but it is a given.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I actually don’t think Apple ever described Mac OS X as open like Android did. The way Android did was always in contrast with Apple’s ways. That was their point.

Apple has boasted about narrow open things, like WebKit, and a few other things. WebKit was so open that Google forked it to make Blink. And WebKit was based on KHTML IIRC. Another open source project. And yes Unix was promoted in marketing. But they never claimed Mac OS X was open like Android did. They boasted about a Unix foundation.

Android never boasted about a Linux foundation. Just about being open.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 days ago

android is a box were the lid only closes halfway on its own, and it took them until now to care enough to close the lid