this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
884 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

83705 readers
2779 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

would be great if they did phones next.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Jolla is the only real option software wise

[–] NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml 6 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

They could throw support behind GrapheneOS, it’s great and it’s Canadian eh

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Graphene is good, though it's still pretty reliant upon Google not making life even harder for them, which it has been doing consistently.

A safer long-term option that is detached from Google's whims entirely is PostmarketOS, which isn't based on Android at all, but is instead a project based on Linux directly.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

If the EU would dare, it could totally fork AOSP. Then each country, company, non-profit can build its own mobile OS on top of it.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 hours ago

I'm not entirely sure if that would be better than just adopting PostmarketOS, since forking AOSP would mean maintaining a fork of that entire ecosystem, and I'm unsure how they would deal with all the phone manufacturers dropping support for phones rather quickly, or using outdated kernels to access GPU and hardware drivers for said phones after the manufacturer drops support.

Investing in PostmarketOS instead would bring with it much less stuff to fork, along with access to the mainline linux kernel (instead of outdated Android ones) that use open-source GPU drivers that can be effectively maintained, and it can support Android compatibility with a compatibility layer, Waydroid.

A polished PostmarketOS ecosystem only seems to offer advantages compared to a forked AOSP, so if they're choosing which to invest in, Postmarket seems like the clear winner.

[–] CLMA31@sopuli.xyz 3 points 22 hours ago

For sure GOS is great, but it is still only android fork. Not real independent alternative for duopoly

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

And it also only works on Google hardware 🤮

(And maybe one future Sony phone maybe?)

[–] NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml 5 points 22 hours ago

It’s confirmed coming to Motorola hardware next year. With more funding and institutional support I’m sure they could assemble a larger pool of devices that meet their requirements

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 0 points 22 hours ago

France is not going to support GOS, 🤣🤣

[–] uuj8za@piefed.social 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Just ordered a Sony Xperia with SailfishOS! I hope you're right! 🤞

(FYI just in case: SailfishOS is NOT an Android fork! I didn't realize this until recently.)

[–] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

Other options exist, but not so polished. It's a tough project that apparently needs more support than small FOSS projects can provide, I've seen a lot of promising alternatives come and go.

Hardware/firmware wise, would really like to see open standards like we have for PC bootloaders. EU requiring nonproprietary bootloaders on phones would be a real step forward.