this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
4 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

56455 readers
619 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago (6 children)

In fairness it likely wouldn't be preserved otherwise. So you're welcome.

[–] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 1 points 2 years ago

White man’s burden

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It was doing fine where it was.

[–] IAmHisBiggestSpoon@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Exactly. Look at the state of it. We definitely should have taken that.

[–] IAmHisBiggestSpoon@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lol, who do you think shot cannon balls at it for target practice? Fuckin' wanker.

[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago

Got to practise firing cannons mate

[–] linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

except that not actually an other hand sorta thing at all, almost exclusively it was colonizers and their wars that destroyed so many of the artifacts that werent stolen, if they weren't delivery destroyed by colonizers to erase history and beyond even that the colonizers carelessness, greed, and racism which they brought to archeology led to much more than just artifacts being destroyed. There are so many historical sites whose histories we will never know at all because these clown excavated them to take "relics" and took little if any records where their precious artifacts were found and how, and that is if sites were not destroyed in their entirety out of sheer idiocy in the search of something else like how troy was. 18th, 19th, and even some 20th century so called archeology is a history of the destruction of history.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

It was already thousands of years old. The British destroyed more artifacts than they "saved".

[–] Z3k3@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That's an interesting point. While I agree it's kinda shitty the UK nicked everyone's cool stuff and shoved it in 1 building. I'm willing to bet if we hadn't the number of pieces that would be lost to time would not be zero

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is just weird revisionist history. They moved in stole shit, colonized and murdered. The after the fact excuse of "we took it to preserve it" doesn't play mostly because their colonizer bullshit is largely the reason areas they stole shit from are destabilized.

[–] Z3k3@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

I'm not revising anything its a shitty thing to do and it should all be returned. It was just a thought with a beer given how volatile some of the areas where the stuff comes and yes I know most of them ended up volatile because of colonialism.

[–] Jilanico@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah I'm totally sure the Brits didn't break a single thing shipping artifacts to their big fancy museum. Let's ignore all the mummies Europeans ground up into powder and ingested as "medicine". Savagely eating dead humans with the same mouths that say brown people are too savage to take care of their own artifacts.