this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2026
235 points (99.6% liked)

World News

55409 readers
2591 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TwoTiredMice@feddit.dk 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Something in this article strikes me, and that is the "download" part. Downloading this data was protected by internal security checks... But what about accessing the data without downloading it? Is that fine?? How much do these employees actually have access to? Most users probably haven't enabled the message encryption.

[–] sakuraba@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

they have access to everything, the issue pointed by the article here as you stated was downloading it

[–] TwoTiredMice@feddit.dk 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

i don't know why it surprises me.. I know that the data is not encrypted, and that it is stored on their servers, but still, I thought the users had at least some minimum of privacy, at least from individuals working at Meta.

[–] sakuraba@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

well in theory they have controls to access this data now but i don't trust them anyway

back then it was free for all, just like Tesla employees watching people having sex

[–] TwoTiredMice@feddit.dk 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I worked for a call center 10+ years ago, and if I searched for customers, which I had not talked to, in our internal CRM system, it would be flagged in an internal system, which potentially could end with employees being fired. I was an inbound customer service rep, and the only thing i thing i could get access to was their name, address and their phone bills.. So, yeah, it just surprises me that the policies around accessing "private" data is so Laissez-faire.

[–] sakuraba@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

yeah it is wild, i dealt with similar policies when working as a support agent for Epic Games: we had access to certain info from every user but everything was logged and suspicious activity was very often reviewed

my guess is that support agents like myself were outsourced, so they had to comply with these policies and i suppose it is the same right now with meta and their moderation staff